Skip to content

Menu

Mayer Brown LLP logo
HomeAbout UsContact
Search
Close

Class Defense Blog

Cutting-Edge Issues in Class Action Law and Policy

M.D. Ala.

Subscribe to M.D. Ala.

Federal District Court: Attorneys Get Paid Even Though No Class Members Submitted Claims

By Evan M. Tager on June 12, 2012
Posted in Arbitration, Class Action Settlements

One of the keys to our victory in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion (the Supreme Court case holding that courts can’t refuse to enforce arbitration provisions on the ground that they preclude class actions) was our ability to pull back the curtain on the consumer class action racket and show that often the only ones who…

Stay Connected

RSS Twitter LinkedIn Facebook

Editors

Photo of Archis A. ParasharamiArchis A. ParasharamiPartner
Photo of Kevin RanlettKevin RanlettPartner

Contributors Show/Hide

  • Evan M. Tager
  • Steven M. Kaplan
  • Lucia Nale
  • Adam Hudes
  • Jonathan Weinberg
  • Hannah Chanoine
  • Hans Germann
  • John Nadolenco
  • Jeffrey Sarles
  • James C. Schroeder
  • Kevin Ranlett
  • Joshua Yount
  • John Zaimes
  • Michael Kimberly
  • Matt Waring
  • Nicole Saharsky
  • Stephen Lilley
  • Tim Bishop
  • Tim Fielden
  • Evan Wooten
  • Erica Speights
  • Archis A. Parasharami
  • Charles E. Harris II
  • Andrew J. Pincus
  • Andrea Weiss
  • Brian Netter
  • Brian Wong
  • Catherine Bernard
  • Chad Clamage
  • Christopher Comstock
  • Christopher Houpt
  • Elaine Liu
  • Christos Papapetrou
  • Carmine Zarlenga
  • Daniel Jones
  • Debra Bogo-Ernst
  • Donald Falk
  • Dale J. Giali
  • Dan Himmelfarb
  • Elizabeth Crepps
  • Thomas Wolf

Topics

  • Adequacy
  • Antitrust
  • Appeals
  • Arbitration
  • Ascertainability
  • CAFA
  • Class Action Settlements
  • Class Action Trends
  • Class Certification
  • Commonality
  • Employment
  • Motions Practice
  • Numerosity
  • Predominance
  • Rule 23(b)(1)
  • Rule 23(b)(2)
  • Securities
  • Superiority
  • Typicality
  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Recent Updates

  • Ninth Circuit holds that California consumers who abandon damages claims can’t get restitution
  • Supreme Court to decide what constitutes an autodialer under the TCPA
  • Supreme Court holds that the TCPA violates the First Amendment but only severs the government-debt exception as a remedy
  • Courts in Telephone Consumer Protection Act cases Are divided on plaintiffs’ ability to revoke their contractual consent to be called
  • Seventh and Eleventh Circuits Reject, But Second Circuit Follows, Ninth Circuit’s Expansive Autodialer Definition in Marks

Class Defense Blog

RSS Twitter LinkedIn Facebook
Mayer Brown LLP logo
DisclaimerPrivacy Policy Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2021, Mayer Brown. All Rights Reserved.
Powered By LexBlog