Skip to content

Menu

Mayer Brown LLP logo
HomeAbout UsContact
Search
Close

Class Defense Blog

Cutting-Edge Issues in Class Action Law and Policy

book review

Subscribe to book review

Book Review: The Class Action Fairness Act: Law and Strategy

By Archis A. Parasharami & Daniel Jones on January 3, 2014
Posted in CAFA, Class Action Trends

In nearly nine years on the books, the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”) has generated a host of decisions interpreting its provisions. Because the state of the law on CAFA—and class actions in general—is in constant flux, practitioners should certainly make use of online resources (like this blog) to stay up to date.…

Stay Connected

RSS Twitter LinkedIn Facebook

Editors

Photo of Archis A. ParasharamiArchis A. ParasharamiPartner
Photo of Kevin RanlettKevin RanlettPartner

Contributors Show/Hide

  • Evan M. Tager
  • Steven M. Kaplan
  • Lucia Nale
  • Adam Hudes
  • Jonathan Weinberg
  • Hannah Chanoine
  • Hans Germann
  • John Nadolenco
  • Jeffrey Sarles
  • James C. Schroeder
  • Kevin Ranlett
  • Joshua Yount
  • John Zaimes
  • Michael Kimberly
  • Matt Waring
  • Nicole Saharsky
  • Stephen Lilley
  • Tim Bishop
  • Tim Fielden
  • Evan Wooten
  • Erica Speights
  • Archis A. Parasharami
  • Charles E. Harris II
  • Andrew J. Pincus
  • Andrea Weiss
  • Brian Netter
  • Brian Wong
  • Catherine Bernard
  • Chad Clamage
  • Christopher Comstock
  • Christopher Houpt
  • Elaine Liu
  • Christos Papapetrou
  • Carmine Zarlenga
  • Daniel Jones
  • Debra Bogo-Ernst
  • Donald Falk
  • Dale J. Giali
  • Dan Himmelfarb
  • Elizabeth Crepps
  • Thomas Wolf

Topics

  • Adequacy
  • Antitrust
  • Appeals
  • Arbitration
  • Ascertainability
  • CAFA
  • Class Action Settlements
  • Class Action Trends
  • Class Certification
  • Commonality
  • Employment
  • Motions Practice
  • Numerosity
  • Predominance
  • Rule 23(b)(1)
  • Rule 23(b)(2)
  • Securities
  • Superiority
  • Typicality
  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Recent Updates

  • Ninth Circuit holds that California consumers who abandon damages claims can’t get restitution
  • Supreme Court to decide what constitutes an autodialer under the TCPA
  • Supreme Court holds that the TCPA violates the First Amendment but only severs the government-debt exception as a remedy
  • Courts in Telephone Consumer Protection Act cases Are divided on plaintiffs’ ability to revoke their contractual consent to be called
  • Seventh and Eleventh Circuits Reject, But Second Circuit Follows, Ninth Circuit’s Expansive Autodialer Definition in Marks

Class Defense Blog

RSS Twitter LinkedIn Facebook
Mayer Brown LLP logo
DisclaimerPrivacy Policy Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2021, Mayer Brown. All Rights Reserved.
Powered By LexBlog